HER EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS

< (117)? -£ (79)? —

so on. Applying

abering that L< S,

— 40.11

- 123.39

| 1,067.11 < 12.06

-£ 1,067.11 — 24.56

o -- 1,067.11 — 33.28

di
di

k uma.at

NČ dana

bna ll PR ta

R X C X S INTERACTION
ROCCO N sš l ho CC 2 l RON m" l CC XN 3 1 K »
PADA MA Xi Tv x > Tuč o >> Tix—RŽ x TatENE Ti,

2

l Cc " I N z T 5
VINI 5 — Raj — 1,360.00 — 1,242.67
tan net ge NR To peg" 1360.0— |

— 1,180.00 — 1,272.00 -- 1,107.22 -- 1,190.50
4 1,115.33 — 1,067.11 < 11.27

TOTAL,

Te:
— z — 1,360.00 — 1] — 292,
RČN 1,360.00 — 1,067.11 92.89

KR C N
Ž X X Xi. —
The analysis-of-variance table for these data is given in Table 19.3,
As indicated in Section 19.5 the appropriate error term for testing row ef-
fects is s,,', for column effects s,,', and for R x C interaction sž.,. The
F ratios are as follows:

Fr< ačTaj 817 p < ..05
siŽ

Bom seo z 18.53 p<.0I

Foo S$ oa, p <..05

In this illustrative example the column effects are significant at better
than the .01 level, whereas row effects and R x C interaction fall between
the .05 and .0! levels of significance.

——— nn z o
Table 19.3

—O<€<06—ŽOOCČd vvTv,..vv,v .,.,.,.,oc,T...oe
Analysis-of-variance table for iltustrative examples of
two-tactor experiment with repeated measures

Source of Sum of Degrees of Variance
variation sguares freedom estimate
OO Sn zniža en o a a ie ija
Rows 40.11 ad 40.11 < s,
Columns 123.39 2 61.70— 3,
Subjects 48.22 S 9.64 < z,
RxC 12.06 2 6.03 — s,
RxS 24.56 5 4IlE;,,
CxS 33.28 io KAKJE KNJ
RxCxS 1t.27 10 LI3E s,
— v v o o. .oe,, o cv, TE
Total 292.89 35

o — o —o—

-.
RENATO K II IE VIZIJE NTI EaNe

zaobiti S EOR

AA AREA pano room ET NE

19.6 ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE OF TWO-FACTOR EXPERIMENT WITH REPEATED MEASUREMENTS 313