a Nm di — z m CC Pace 30 Strategic-Information Systems: A Formula for Success In this, the first of five columnš on strategic sys- tems, James Martin de- scribes how a corporation can use informa: tilon-systems technology to nn gatn a competi- tive advantage. bari Ši Ai dota di in recent M ARTIN years, there have 4 been many ex- amples of one Corporation pulling ahead by making better use of information technolo Ogy than its competitors. At the same time, there have been some corporations that have watched their earnings decline (sometimes to the edge of bankruptey) because their competition used comput:- ers, microelectronics, intercorporate net- works or information i in new competi- tive thrusts. One of the most important guestions in corporate computing is, how can we use information technology to gain a competitive advantage? Systems that enable a corporation to gain a direct advantage over its compe- tition are called strategic systems. Some of these are on-line systems that directly enable the corporation to accomplish a mission, and are referred to as mission- critical systems. Examples of mission-critical systems are an airline operating a network of terminals in travel agents' offices and a distributor using on-line computers in. its customer locations. A mission-critical system operates at the heart of the business, performing vi- tal corporate and intercorporate func- tions. If the system stops, those aspects of the business stop. A strategic system is thus critical to the functioning of the business rather than a back-room, pa- perwork-processing system, as most commercial computers are. As shown in the figure, strategic-sys- tems opportunities include on-line links to customers, agents, distributors, retail- ers and suppliers, as well as software in customer locations, new products, auto- mated fabrication, service innovations, strategic alliances and so on. Corporate presidents are strongly con- cerned with how their organizations can do better than the competition or how they can prevent the competition from taking business away from their organi- zations. They need to regard the com- puter and information system as critical weapons in their battles with competi- tion. Some corporate presidents do not. have this vision yet. They still regar computers as an overhead cost that should be minimized whenever possible. One president of a large corporation in Manhattan told me, "Tm an enemy of computers in this place. All | want to know about them is how much they cost—and it's too much." At the same time, his competition was devising in- ventive ways of using information tech- poe anno kemo O O PG WEEKNAPPLICATION DEVELOPMENT DPPLJED INTELLIGENCE (V in which information systems can en- hance the competitive position of a cor- poration. Rigorous business-planning methodolo- gies—the analysis of goals and prob- lems, technology-impact analysis and critical-success-factor analysis—should be used, but strategic-systems vision is perhaps the most important; technigue for top-level planning. The habit of thinking about how technology can change (or radically transform) the en: terprise to make it. more competitive needs to start at the top and pervade the entire enterprise. End users with In- formation Center tools need to be en- For corporate Federal Express was once a small up- start confronted with numerous compet: ing airfreight companies. Benetton in It- aly was, in the early 1970s, a small fam- ily business in a no-growth industry with tough, old, established large firms. Reuters, in the 1850s, used the tech- nology of carrier pigeons to distribute news and details of transactions on the Brussels stock exchange faster than its competition. In the 19705, it again out- did its competition by providing finan- cial information on terminal screens with its worldwide news network, and then enabling its customers to make trades over that network. ne 4: daji bas a E ac "pa A m, ii io Vrat zl kak. Ž S nožni 7 x T. nie rana moč z om % d s! KE. sa di sani m. > ; x pi aaa , S. oa ae z s važn a mene z an - ne di silnih s a di sk s a. z Y s 4; DR ae Ek kai En UR Či Da: us. Maja kača ea pri se — | OE mrena ma x — a . uta: gi V 4 - i Ha nada lji dai, ij Sm - ui Pak spam! a uje ui ie lea o k. NE. . a a BU: ma davi moi m ", u s m ped Pelika ie zije je eki NR iča a JN Mea A s PREJE v EI NOM pat HE Je m zu ve JJ mi z nai— —im ama aaa oe bob AME sa Ne amen agen ni NPPRELE PN IE kj tnih s ua Sta: kaj Pe am EME. 7 H s s ; a ., 4 5 Bače. a, ee ia . Es e JP k: s, uč "o. Mk dam kodi Paleta be s sika, iz db, ja - m i - ' alk ia zača k s ri ! Svaka a nd , the com po m information systems are weapons in their battles to do better than their competitors. couraged to explore how they can use 'computing strategically. Many highly competitive corporations are successfully employing new technol- —ogy to create a major innovative busi- ness thrust. Some of these companies were old, established corporations that changed their methods of operating. Some were new corporations that, used technology in an innovative way to grow rapidly. Some fundamentally changed a basic link in the industry chain, as when American Airlines put travel 9 agenta on-line to its computer Ezpi were David and Gollath situation where a small company ana wi tehnolog. als into clinics. Some malo: bed z La RADE —- mni pe promo Nela E A preemptive strike, as it's used in this context, describes a corporation making a thrust that establishes an ad- vantage that cannot be dislodged by its competition. When American and Unit: ed Airlines established terminals (and later, on-line PCs) in travel agents' of: fices, other airlines were left out in the cold. American Hospital Supply similarly preempted its competition. Its terminals were attractive to clinics and hospitals, and usually were not dislodged by com- petition once they were in place. Charles Wiseman, in his book "Strategy and Computers," guotes industry execu- 5 vol sa mina fba American Hospital | sponsible for driving competitors li ike A i yo sie žni mi. zuni! Pe njim «A. a | " ši NOVEMBER 28, 1988 S. Aloe Co. and Will Ross Inc. from the hospital-supply distribution business. Once a hospital got an ASAP terminal, American Hospital Supply couldn't be budged." | The examples discussed here relate to | large corporations (although some were || small when the strategic decisions were initiated). Strategic systems vision is highly relevant to small corporations, as well, and there are numerous examples. of small-scale strategic thrusts. Some | small accounting firms, for example, | with less than a hundred customers, re- | alized in the 1980s that they could intro- duce personal computer packages to their customers and grow their client base rapidly. Their competition that did not. move in this direction lost clients. An analysis of strategic opportunities may make it clear that a corporation re- guires technology that it does not. pos- sess. It may need to buy a corporation that does have that: technology. Some strategies have been to make acguisi- tions. In the late 1970s, Dun £ Brad- street searched for appropriate takeover candidates to acguire both information and technology that would further its strategic vision. Acguisitions The firm purchased National CSS (NCSS), a leading time-sharing company with the innovative fourth-generation language (NOMAD) and a nationwide time-sharing network. Next, itpur- || chased McCormick and Dodge, oneof£ ||. RI the ie software a miti MO LJ, consumer-research O ETUN nin 8 Bradstreet also purchased several televi: sion stations and cable television sys- tems. Later it refined the facilities it needed to help meet; its mission by sell- ing its television stations and systems and selling the NOMAD language (which by then looked somewhat, old-fash- ioned). This process of acguiring and selling facilities can adjust, a corpora- tion's resources to help it. meet its stra- tegic vision. To succeed fully in an era of rapidly changing technology, a corporation needs to understand the technology and to develop a strategic vision of how it can use technology to achieve something better than its competition. It may plan a preemptive strike against its competi- tion. The strategic vision should be bold and clear. To implement it, systems may be created in-house, acguired externally, or acguisitions or mergers may be planned. Next week, well look at the ma— risks involved in the Pera o peni of strategic-information s The James Martin Productivity Series, an tnformation service updated guar- terly, is available through High Pro- ductivity Software Inc., of Marble- <— head, Mass. (617) 639.1958. For infor- — mation on Poni, po contact se eo | nology Transfer h Santa Monica, Calif. 90102 (218) 904. ČL 8305. In Europe, contact Savant, 2? New St, Carnforth, Lancs., LA5 9BX Muied Kingdom ( (ari? 734 505. ae ii dai a